主办单位：“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心、中国政法大学证据科学研究院
编辑部：《法庭科学与法医学杂志（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区西土城路25号中国政法大学证据科学研究院
邮编：100088
国内统一刊号：无CN刊号
国际标准刊号：ISSN2349-5014；EISSN2455-0094
非常好！会向别人推荐！
比较好！我会经常使用！
感觉一般！可以用！
比较差！很少用！
万维提示：
1、该刊只有国际刊号。
2、投稿方式：在线投稿。
自动跳转至：
4、投稿网址：
5、主办单位网址：
（中国政法大学证据科学研究院）
7、官网电话：010-62926975
8、出刊日期：季刊，一年出版4期。
9、微信公众号：法大鉴定（fadajianding）
《法庭科学与法医学杂志（英文）》
（Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine）
期刊简介【主办单位官网信息】
JFSM（法庭科学与法医学杂志）编辑部
秉承“让世界了解中国法庭科学，让中国法庭科学走向世界”创刊主旨，JFSM期刊广泛涵盖与法律问题交叉的科学与医学主题，专业领域涉及犯罪学、数字/多媒体科学、工程科学、法医人类学、法医临床学、法医齿科学、法医病理学、法医生物学、法医放射学、法医毒物学、法学、文件检验、法医精神病学与行为科学等多学科分支，JFSM也接受法庭科学与法医学中技术和责任事故以及伦理相关问题的投稿。
近年来，中国政法大学证据科学研究院在国际交流与人才引进方面取得了显著成绩，2013年进入首批“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心，同时又获批“高等学校学科创新引智计划”（简称“111计划”）。这一切为我们创办英文国际期刊提供了良好的平台和机遇，也符合中国高等教育最新战略工程“2011计划”的部署以及“国家急需、世界一流”的要求。
JFSM杂志的编委会成员包括众多国际专家和国内相关领域知名学者和两位中国工程院院士，美籍华人李玲博士（Dr. Ling Li）担任本刊主编。李玲教授现为美国马里兰州法医局执业鉴定人，法医病理学家，兼马里兰大学医学院教授。这些专家常年从事法庭科学与法医学的科研与实践工作，将以对事业的热忱和对专业的执着为您稿件的审查与发表提供最优质的服务。
JFSM杂志诚挚邀请您支持属于中国法庭科学、法医学同行自己的国际英文杂志，欢迎您将闪耀中国学者智慧的优秀文章进行投稿。JFSM杂志可接受的稿件类型包括：原著科研论文original research articles, 综述reviews, 案例报道case reports, 短篇交流brief communications, 社论editorials, 评论commentaries, 读者来信letters to the editor，等等。
您投稿至JFSM杂志的优势在于：
● 国际同行专家评议保证您投稿的最终质量
● 投稿评审接受后快捷出版(电子版和印刷版)
● 携手国际出版商-威科（Wolters Kluwer），全球可检索并可免费阅读
● 初期暂定无版面费，2015年出版两期，自2016年起为季刊。
● 英语质量欠缺的投稿，编辑部可协助语言校译
主办单位：“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心，中国政法大学证据科学研究院
联系电话: 010-62926975
出版社：威科医疗（Wolters Kluwer Health）及其旗下的Medknow。
威科医疗卫生隶属于全球领先的信息服务商——威科集团，旗下知名品牌包括Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Ovid, UpToDate 等等。威科集团2013 年的年收益达36亿欧元（47亿美元），全球约有19000名员工，在北美、欧洲、亚太和拉丁美洲的 40 多个国家运营。威科集团总部位于荷兰。Medknow是威科集团旗下以出版医学领域开放获取期刊为主的出版品牌，Medknow与全球300多家协会和机构合作，已出版开放获取期刊350余种。
编辑部成员：赵东（编辑部主任）、黄帅（编辑部编辑）、张笑莹（编辑部编辑）
《法庭科学与法医学杂志（英文）》
（Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine）
作者须知【官网信息】
Instructions to the Authors
About the Journal
Scope of the journal
The journal will cover the broadest range of science and medical topics interacting with law. Subjects include but are not limited to criminalistics,digital and multimedia sciences,engineering science, forensic anthropology,forensic clinical medicine,forensic odontology,forensic pathology,forensic biology,forensic radiology,forensic toxicology,jurisprudence, questioned documents, forensic psychiatry and behavioural Science. Submissions of malpractice or ethics in forensic science and medicine are also acceptable. The Journal publishes original research articles, reviews, case reports, brief communications, commentaries, editorials, and others.
The Editorial Process
A manuscript will be reviewed for possible publication with the understanding that it is being submitted to Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine alone at that point in time and has not been published anywhere, simultaneously submitted, or already accepted for publication elsewhere. The journal expects that authors would authorize one of them to correspond with the Journal for all matters related to the manuscript. All manuscripts received are duly acknowledged. On submission, editors review all submitted manuscripts initially for suitability for formal review. Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message are rejected before proceeding for formal peer-review. Manuscripts that are unlikely to be of interest to the Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine readers are also liable to be rejected at this stage itself.
Manuscripts received from Editorial Board members will be screened by the Editor in Chief and sent to external peer reviewers. The editorial board members who are authors will be excluded from publication decisions.
Manuscripts that are found suitable for publication in Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine are sent to two or more expert reviewers. During submission, the contributor is requested to provide names of two or three qualified reviewers who have had experience in the subject of the submitted manuscript, but this is not mandatory. The reviewers should not be affiliated with the same institutes as the contributor/s. However, the selection of these reviewers is at the sole discretion of the editor. The journal follows a double-blind review process, wherein the reviewers and authors are unaware of each other’s identity. Every manuscript is also assigned to a member of the editorial team, who based on the comments from the reviewers takes a final decision on the manuscript. The comments and suggestions (acceptance/ rejection/ amendments in manuscript) received from reviewers are conveyed to the corresponding author. If required, the author is requested to provide a point by point response to reviewers’ comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript. This process is repeated till reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript.
Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. Page proofs are sent to the corresponding author. The corresponding author is expected to return the corrected proofs within three days. It may not be possible to incorporate corrections received after that period. The whole process of submission of the manuscript to final decision and sending and receiving proofs is completed online. To achieve faster and greater dissemination of knowledge and information, the journal publishes articles online as ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance.
Clinical trial registry
Authorship Criteria
Authorship credit should be based only on substantial contributions to each of the three components mentioned below:
Concept and design of study or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data;
Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and
Final approval of the version to be published.
Participation solely in the acquisition of funding or the collection of data does not justify authorship. General supervision of the research group is not sufficient for authorship. Each contributor should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content of the manuscript. The order of naming the contributors should be based on the relative contribution of the contributor towards the study and writing the manuscript. Once submitted the order cannot be changed without written consent of all the contributors. The journal prescribes a maximum number of authors for manuscripts depending upon the type of manuscript, its scope and number of institutions involved (vide infra). The authors should provide a justification, if the number of authors exceeds these limits.
Contribution Details
Contributors should provide a description of contributions made by each of them towards the manuscript. Description should be divided in following categories, as applicable: concept, design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, clinical studies, experimental studies, data acquisition, data analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing and manuscript review. One or more author should take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole from inception to published article and should be designated as 'guarantor'.